States across the U.S. are increasingly turning to AI-powered surveillance systems for school security, prompting discussions on legislative support, market competition, and safety priorities.
Increasing Use of AI in School Security Across U.S.
In an effort to enhance school safety, schools across the United States are adopting artificial intelligence (AI) technologies coupled with video cameras to detect firearms on school premises. Companies like ZeroEyes are at the forefront of this shift, pushing for legislative support to secure state funding for these technologies. ZeroEyes, founded by military veterans post the tragedy at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, specializes in AI-driven firearms detection systems.
Legislative Developments and Grants
Several states, including Kansas, Missouri, Michigan, Utah, Florida, Iowa, Colorado, Louisiana, and Wisconsin, are considering or have passed legislation to financially back the implementation of firearms detection software. For example, Kansas is proposing up to $5 million in grants for schools to implement surveillance systems that meet stringent criteria, such as being patented, having anti-terrorism designation, and compliance with certain security standards. As of now, ZeroEyes is the only company meeting these criteria in Kansas, leading to concerns about market competition and the specificity of legislative requirements.
Concerns and Competitions
The push for using this specific technology has sparked a debate about whether funds are being directed towards the most pressing safety needs of schools. Some industry experts argue that while AI weapon detection is impressive, schools may have more immediate safety needs that are less costly. Companies like Omnilert, which also offers AI-based weapons detection but lacks certain certifications and patents, argue that the legislation is anti-competitive.
Impact and Opinions
AI technology for weapon detection is being described as a proactive measure to prevent gun violence in schools. Critics, however, question whether legislative tactics favoring specific companies may inhibit fair competition and limit schools’ options. The ongoing developments reflect a broader movement towards integrating advanced technology in school safety measures while also highlighting challenges related to funding allocation, legislative processes, and product market competition.
Next Steps
As states proceed with implementing and expanding these technologies, the impact on school safety and the competitive landscape for safety technology vendors will continue to evolve. The overarching goal remains to enhance the security and safety of educational environments through innovative solutions.
