The increased frequency of school shootings in the United States has prompted a shift towards AI technology in enhancing school security measures. Despite the potential benefits, challenges such as error-prone systems and image quality issues need to be addressed to ensure effective implementation.
On May 24, 2022, Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, experienced a tragic event where 18-year-old Salvador Ramos, a former student, fatally shot 19 children and two teachers after entering the building through an unlocked door.
Since the beginning of the 2023-24 school year, gunfire incidents on K-12 campuses in the United States have been recorded 300 times. Over the past ten years, school shootings have surged, with numbers increasing from 34 in 2013 to 348 in 2023.
The rise in school shootings has led to a growing demand for advanced security measures. Many educational institutions are investing in artificial intelligence (AI) and other technologies intended to detect potential threats. This has expanded the school security industry into a multibillion-dollar market. Budget constraints, lack of equipment, and personnel shortages are challenges many schools face, making AI an attractive option to automatically detect threats faster than human capability.
David Riedman, the founder of the K-12 School Shooting Database, has collected data on over 2,700 school shootings since 1966. His research indicates that AI can offer considerable potential in enhancing school security through applications like computer vision and pattern analysis with large language models. These technologies assist in interpreting signals from metal detectors, classifying objects on CCTV, identifying gunshot sounds, and even searching social media for threats.
However, the implementation of AI in school security is not without its challenges. AI systems often provide probability-based answers rather than absolutes, which can lead to errors. For instance, during an incident at Brazoswood High School in Clute, Texas, AI misinterpreted a shadow for a gun, causing a lockdown. Moreover, cameras may produce poor-quality images under various conditions, making it difficult for AI to accurately process them.
As AI technology continues to evolve, schools must understand its limitations and capabilities. School security solutions must be tailored to the unique environment of educational campuses rather than relying on technology designed for different contexts. Effective AI applications in schools require sophisticated sensors and advanced technology to address the problem of students bringing weapons to school, a common scenario identified in Riedman’s studies.
In conclusion, while AI holds promise for enhancing school safety, it is essential for schools to carefully consider the capabilities and constraints of these technologies to ensure they are effectively used to protect students and staff.